One review object
The asset, version, brief, owner, and review window must be unmistakable.
Creative review tools should do more than collect annotations. The useful outcome is a trusted decision about a named version, made by the right person, with every condition and downstream action preserved.
The asset, version, brief, owner, and review window must be unmistakable.
Contributors can comment while an authorized approver makes the final call.
The decision, conditions, timestamp, and next action should remain attached to the project.
The best fit depends on asset types, stakeholder complexity, compliance needs, and what must happen after approval.
See whether the system helps consolidate comments instead of merely displaying conflict.
Old comments must not silently reappear as unresolved work on a later approved version.
Record the exact approver, version, time, result, conditions, and resulting status change.
Approval should update delivery, publication, invoicing, or the next milestone without manual reconstruction.
Specialist proofing and connected client-work systems can both be valid choices.
Product facts checked against Teamwork.com agency features and Stelaah comparison methodology on 2026-08-09.
It should bind feedback and approval to an exact version, identify decision authority, preserve history, and trigger the correct next action.
It depends on the work. Visual markup is valuable for design and media, but decision ownership and version history remain essential.
Yes, if the authorized decision is copied into the canonical record with the exact version, date, conditions, and next action.
Test one review round from request through recorded decision.